Warning: include(/usr/www/users/shinymda/sh1ny/spurspies/_includes/shinybarleft.html) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /usr/www/users/shinymda/sh1ny/spurspies/debate_of_the_day/index.html on line 58
Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '/usr/www/users/shinymda/sh1ny/spurspies/_includes/shinybarleft.html' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/local/lib/php') in /usr/www/users/shinymda/sh1ny/spurspies/debate_of_the_day/index.html on line 58
Warning: include(/usr/www/users/shinymda/sh1ny/spurspies/_includes/shinybarright.html) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /usr/www/users/shinymda/sh1ny/spurspies/debate_of_the_day/index.html on line 58
Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '/usr/www/users/shinymda/sh1ny/spurspies/_includes/shinybarright.html' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/local/lib/php') in /usr/www/users/shinymda/sh1ny/spurspies/debate_of_the_day/index.html on line 58
After yesterday's heated debate about whether Spurs should leave White Hart Lane for a purpose-built new stadium, I thought we'd simply put it to the vote and get a definitive idea of who wants what.
So, make your choice below and then if you still want to tell us your reasons for going or staying, post them as a comment...
We had a quick discussion the other day about this when I said how impressed I was about the transport links to and from the new Wembley Stadium and how they showed up the useless trains and tubes around White Hart Lane.
It was said before Christmas that Daniel Levy and the Club would announce in February or March their plans for Tottenham Hotspur with regard to where we are going to be playing our football in the future.
The main two options always seem to have been: a) move away to a purpose built stadium or b) transform the current ground by spinning it around and enlarging it into the land Tottenham Hotspur PLC have bought up nearby.
But the second one relies on Haringey Council lobbying the Government to improve the transport infrastructure in the area and if their hap-hazard way of implementing a Controlled Parking Zone is anything to go by, we've no hope of that coming to fruition.
Today's Daily Telegraph hints that an announcement is imminent and points to sites north of White Hart Lane and in Enfield as potential places for a new 50,000-seater stadium.
As speculation inevitably mounts over the future of Dimitar Berbatov, can the importance of keeping the Bulgarian superstar at Spurs really be overstated?
In the cut-throat game of modern football, contracts, signing-on fees and balancing the books are now talked about as much if not more than tactics, team selections and man-management. Every fan worth his salt has become au fait with the intricate inner-workings of the transfer system, and phrases such as 'sell-on clause' and 'Bosman ruling' are commonplace in pub discussions up and down the country.
So, in this brave new world, is the signature that we all hope and pray Dimitar Berbatov signs on a new and improved deal to stay at Spurs potentially the most important in the club's history? I'd like to put forward the argument that it most certainly is. Though Berbatov, at the end of this season, will be only two years into the four-year contract he signed upon joining the club in 2006, no one can be in any doubt that failing to secure his signature on a new deal would signal the end of his time as a Spurs player.
Berbatov arrived at Spurs from Bayer Leverkusen amid reports of an 11th hour attempt by Manchester United to hijack the move. Berbatov later confirmed these reports, but revealed that he had chosen Spurs because “Spurs stood by me the whole time and sometimes that's more important”. After showing such loyalty and courtesy to the club upon first signing, the time has now come for the club to repay Berbatov's faith, with repay being the operative word.
Reports in today's papers name recent signing Jonathan Woodgate as the club's top earner, and whilst it is understandable that the board will have deemed worthy to pay top dollar for a player who has already made a huge impact on the side, it is also inconceivable that they could value him as highly as they do Berbatov.
Berbatov's first season at the club was a revelation, though the one accusation levelled at him during that time was that he failed to turn it on against the better sides in the league, and indeed, he had but one goal against a top four side to his name at the end of his first season. Recently, however, he has managed to find that big game mentality, and in the last two months, he has scored against Arsenal, Manchester United and, of course Chelsea. His reputation is growing with every passing game, and it can be presumed that his list of potential suitors is growing just as rapidly.
In the aftermath of Sunday's cup victory, a lot of articles in the mainstream press have pointed to the fact that Spurs are the first non-'Big Four' club to win a major trophy since Middlesbrough won the same competition in 2004.
The fact that four clubs have had such a stranglehold on our domestic game is certainly an astonishing development, but it does lead to some interesting questions. For years, fans of clubs such as Spurs, Everton, Manchester City, Aston Villa and others have argued over whether or not their clubs still count as 'big', despite prolonged periods without success.
The desire to be considered 'big' is seemingly huge in the modern game, and the established Big Four, Manchester United, Liverpool, Arsenal and Chelsea, rarely miss an opportunity to stress just how mighty and powerful they are. The recent publishing of football's richest clubs only served to emphasise this fact, in which United were surpassed only by Real Madrid, and the other three clubs all featured in the top 8.
But truly, can money be a serious factor in deducing whether or not a team is 'big'? The only two English clubs outside of the Big Four to be featured were Spurs and Newcastle, but surely Newcastle's lack of silverware leaves them a long way behind the likes of Villa and Everton when it comes to stature.
Our colleagues over at Chelsea Pies have started a massive debate with their post: "Would any Spurs players make it into Chelsea’s first XI?" Many argue the likes of Ledley King and Dimitar Berbatov would. But it got me thinking, who would Tottenham fans want at White Hart Lane from Stamford Bridge.
I guess the list would be reasonably long at first glance but narrowing it down, the main players on my Chelsea shopping list would be Petr Cech (obvious choice), Alex, Shaun Wright-Phillips, Joe Cole and Didier Drogba.
Other than that, I'm not that fussed by the rest of their squad, although I've always thought Wayne Bridge would be a great asset to us seeing as he can't really keep hold of a place in west London. Oh yeh, and if Roman Abramovitch fancies making the switch, he's more than welcome.
But who would you like to see running out at the Lane in Lilywhite rather than trudging around the Bridge in Blue. Post your views below...
With the various reports that have circulated over the past month regarding the state of Ledley King's (re-constructed) knee, suggesting the injury is so far gone our star defender can only play one match in three, it raises the question of whether we should keep him at the club.
I know people will go mad at that suggestion and in an ideal world, all of us supporters hope King can get fit enough to actually start making at least that one game in three, which he isn't doing right now.
But is that even enough to warrant having him on the payroll? And if come the summer he still hasn't featured with any kind of regularity, surely Juande Ramos will need to make a decision on whether he wants to move him on.
Some time ago a transfer would have represented the unthinkable, but now it would not be surprising if Daniel Levy decided it was worth Ledley leaving White Hart Lane while he can still attract some sort of fee. After all, Levy has already demonstrated he isn't in football to win any popularity contests, so he may approach the topic somewhat dispassionately and show him the door.
Warning: include(/usr/www/users/shinymda/sh1ny/spurspies/_includes/latest.html) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /usr/www/users/shinymda/sh1ny/spurspies/debate_of_the_day/index.html on line 560
Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '/usr/www/users/shinymda/sh1ny/spurspies/_includes/latest.html' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/local/lib/php') in /usr/www/users/shinymda/sh1ny/spurspies/debate_of_the_day/index.html on line 560
digg this |
del.icio.us this
| 
Stumble It!
